Introduction An Indian Law student cannot possibly study constitutional law without studying certain landmark judgements. The judgement given in I.C. Golaknath & Ors vs State of Punjab [i] seems to be of great importance. This case happens to be one …
Introduction Women are treated as Goddess in India. Is that so? Do we indeed think that women have achieved that position? It is the very worst and pathetic situation in India that despite worshipping the women like goddess, they are …
Introduction: The ruling of Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India, handed down by a seven-judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court on January 25, 1978,[1] marked the beginning of a new period in the interpretation of fundamental rights guaranteed by …
Introduction: The industrial manufacturing sector is pivotal for the buoyancy of the Indian economy. Since this production sector extended its hands to facilitate economic sustainability, it has branched with diversified industries indulged and engaged in manufacturing automobiles, pieces of machinery, …
Introduction: “There were ‘grave consequences’ to treating the constitution as ‘as ordinary law to be changed at the will of the party in power’. If governments always could be trusted, there would have been no need for Fundamental Right.”[1] While …
Landmark Judgements The Hon’ble Supreme Court judgements are very important to have a better understanding of the Constitution of our country. Many questions have been asked in the UPSC, APP, APO, CLAT, UGC NET & Judiciary exams about various landmark …
On seventh Sep 2020, The Supreme Court on account of The New India Assurance Company Limited v. Somwati containing Justice Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy in their Judgment expressed that if there should arise an occurrence of Motor Accident …
Abstract In India Section 124-A which governs the laws against the offence of sedition has been rampantly used by the numerous Central and State governments to suppress fair criticism and political dissent by journalists. This has been at work blatantly …
Nestle India Limited filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court primarily on the contentions that the natural principles of justice were not adhered by not providing show cause notices before the two impugned orders were passed[1] and that …
A bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice KM Joseph has delivered a verdict on an appeal made by a man who was jailed under the offence Drunk Driving that a private vehicle, while running or parked on public place …
