Introduction
The term marshalling intends to gather or accumulate and afterward arrange them in proper order, in the event of contrasts or clashes in interests or claims revamp so that there are equity, justice and extreme fulfillment to all[1]. The regulation of marshaling has been set out under sec 56 and 81 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882. Section 56 sets out the arrangement of marshaling by resulting buyer under sale and section 81 sets out the arrangement of marshaling under home loan. The teaching of contribution has been set out under section 82 of the Act. Marshalling is something contrary to contribution. The standard of marshalling shields the interest of the considerable number of mortgagees though the reason for the standard contribution is to defend the enthusiasm of the home loan[2].
Doctrine of Marshalling
Section 81 of the Transfer of Property Act, manages the regulation of Marshaling of securities.
As per Sec. 81: In the event that the proprietor of at least two properties –
i) Mortages them to one individual,
ii) And then mortages at least one of the properties to someone else,
In such a case, the resulting mortage is qualified to have earlier mortage-obligation fulfilled out of property or properties which are not mortaged to him. This won’t influence the right of the earlier mortagee who has aquired interset for any of the properties for thought[3].
Essentials:
- The mortgagees might be at least two people yet the mortgagor must be common i.e., there must be a common debtor.
- The right can’t be practiced to be the prejudice of the earlier mortgagee.
- The right can’t be practiced to the prejudice of any other person having claim over the property.
In Barness v. Rector[4], W mortgaged two of his properties A and B to X. W then mortgaged property A to Y and property B to Z. Here, the court held that X’s mortgages will be apportioned proportionately between properties A and B and the surplus of A will go to Y and surplus of B will go to Z.
Contribution of Mortgage Debt (Section 82)
Contribution implies giving cash to the common fund. Section 82 of the transfer of property act manages the principles identifying with the contribution of cash towards sold obligation[5]. It is the privilege of an individual who has released a typical obligation to recover a proportionate offer from others. The doctrine of contribution necessitates that the people under normal liabilities that liabilities impartial.[6]
Section 82 contemplates over a circumstance in which there are at least two than two mortgagors who take a typical obligation by selling various properties in a single property[7]. The doctrine of contribution depends on the standards of value, equity and great confidence or great conscience. Every mortgagor or indebted person must be at risk to add to such basic obligation[8]. At the point when at least two properties of various people are sold to make sure about a credit, the mortgagee has the privilege to recover the obligation from the property of any one individual[9].
Rules of Contribution
The Standard of Commitment identifies with the aggregate commitment towards a mortgage debt. It gives one mortgagor the option to have the other’s property add to the release of the home loan obligation. At the point when a lender has a solitary case against a few account holders, he can understand the obligation from any of them, however, according to the standard of commitment he can guarantee commitment to the obligation by different indebted individuals, with the goal that the weight may fall on all similarly[10].
Differentiation between Marshalling and Contribution
- Marshaling is the privilege of subsequent while contribution is identified with mortgagors.
- A subsequent mortgagee requires that earlier mortgagee will recover his obligation out of the property not mortgaged to him in marshaling. Though in contribution all the co-mortgagors who have taken obligation selling their properties need to make contribution towards obligation rateably as indicated by their respective proportions[11].
Conclusion
Marshaling is the privilege of subsequent mortgagees while contribution is as for mortgagors. Marshaling is if a leaser has different assets to understand his obligation, he should initially seek after the various assets as opposed to prejudicing the creditor who is made sure about just by one reserve[12]. Though in contribution all the co-mortgagors who have taken an obligation by selling their properties need to make contribution towards obligation proportionately as indicated by their individual offers. The proviso to sec 82 of TPA offers priority to the previous over the last mentioned.
[1] Black’s Law Dictionary (2nd Edition).
[2] Radhika Saxena, Doctrine Of Marshalling And Contribution, 20 January, 2020 Https://Indianjudiciarynotes.Com/Notes/Transfer-Of-Property/Doctrine-Of-Marshalling-And-Contribution/
[3] Http://Kanoon.Nearlaw.Com/2017/10/24/Doctrine-Marshalling-Property-Act/ last visited on june 19, 2020.
[4] Rector v. rector SCC 1973.
[5]Http://Lawtimesjournal.In/Marshalling-And Contribution/#:~:Text=The%20doctrine%20of%20contribution%20has,The%20interest%20of%20the%20mortgage.
[6] Ibid,5
[7] Transfer Of Property Act 1882, Section 82
[8] Supra Note, 3
[9] Https://Www.Juscholars.Com/Post/Doctrine-Of-Marshalling-And-Contribution
[10] Https://Blog.Ipleaders.In/Rule-Marshalling-Contribution/
[11] Https://Www.Legalbites.In/Marshalling-Contribution-And-Subrogation-Tpa-1882/
[12] Https://Blog.Ipleaders.In/Rule-Marshalling-Contribution/ Last Visited On June 20, 2020
This article is authored by Khushboo, Second-Year, BBA. LL.B (Hons.) student at Geeta Institute of Law
Also Read – Is Transfer of Property To An Unborn Person Valid?
